ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Pharmacovigilance assessment of adverse events following yellow fever vaccination: Disproportionality analysis of VAERS reports, 2015-2025.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review on Yellow Fever Vaccine and Adverse Events.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2026Pooled it
- Adverse Events Following Yellow Fever Vaccination in Older Adults in Colombia, 2024-2025: A National Pharmacovigilance Analysis.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yellow fever vaccination remains the most effective strategy for preventing infection in endemic and travel-associated settings, yet rare severe adverse events such as viscerotropic and neurotropic disease continue to raise safety concerns. Adverse event reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed. Disproportionality algorithms were applied to evaluate reporting patterns, with subgroup analyses by age and sex. The most frequent events were local injection-site reactions and mild systemic symptoms, consistent with clinical trial findings. Severe outcomes, including yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic and neurotropic disease, demonstrated strong disproportionality signals despite their rarity. Additional hypersensitivity-related and less traditional preferred terms were also detected across multiple methods. Female recipients showed higher frequencies of local reactions, while severe events were proportionally more common in older individuals. The analysis reaffirms the established safety profile of yellow fever vaccine while highlighting rare but clinically important severe events and emerging signals. Continued post-marketing surveillance and targeted risk communication remain essential to optimize safe vaccine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.