ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Severity of perineal tears and deviations in perineal body anatomy: A three-dimensional ultrasound study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPerineal tears are classified into four degrees based on severity. Second-degree tears, which involve the muscles fusing into the perineal body, but not the anal sphincter, vary in extent and have recently been subcategorized. However, knowledge about their long-term anatomical impact on the perineal body remains limited, as postpartum evaluation has largely relied on inspection and palpation. This study aimed to examine the association between the severity of perineal tears not affecting the anal sphincter, diagnosed at delivery, and deviations in the muscles fusing into the perineal body, assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound 1 year after vaginal delivery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective cohort study included 384 primiparous women with vaginal deliveries at Akershus University Hospital, Norway, from January 2021 to July 2022. Perineal tears were classified and sutured according to international standards at delivery. In addition, second-degree tears were subclassified according to the percentage of the perineal body damage (<50% = 2A, ≥50% = 2B, entire perineal body without anal sphincter = 2C). Women with third- or fourth-degree tears were excluded. One year after delivery, participants underwent three-dimensional endovaginal and endoanal ultrasound examinations. The transverse perineal, puboperinealis, and puboanalis muscles were examined at their fusion into the perineal body. A deviation was defined as a muscle discontinuity or absence in at least one of the muscles.
resultsThe proportion of women with sonographically detected muscle deviations increased with tear severity: 22% for first-degree (n = 24), 52.7% for 2A (n = 29), 60% for 2B (n = 21) and 86.2% for 2C (n = 25). Among women with episiotomies (n = 126), 60.6% had one or more muscle deviations. A higher number of muscles were affected in the 2C tear group compared to 2B and 2A.
conclusionSonographic deviations in the muscles fusing into the perineal body increase with the severity of perineal tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.