ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Brain-Pupil Coupling Revealed Through Deep Learning of Intracranial Recordings.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed-loop stimulation modulates attention shifting in children.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Brain-Pupil Coupling Revealed Through Deep Learning of Intracranial Recordings.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupillary responses are windows into human cognition, but their neural substrates are poorly understood. We studied brain-pupil coupling through intracranial recordings and pupillometry in 13 children and youth with epilepsy (ages 9-18) during an attentional set-shifting task. Time-resolved mixed-effects modelling identified associations between pupil diameter, neural activity and cognitive performance. We first showed that pupillary dynamics are closely linked to cognitive performance, with task-stage dependencies. Larger pupil sizes prior to stimulus onset were associated with faster reaction times, whereas smaller pupil sizes during and after stimulus presentation were linked to better performance. Next, linear models identified associations between band-limited power in task-relevant neural networks and pupil size changes during the task. Finally, deep learning models based on intracranial neural activity captured patterns predictive of changes in pupil size in five of seven participants that generalised to recordings from a separate day. Using salience-based gradient mapping, we identified a network of task-relevant cortical and subcortical regions whose engagement was consistently associated with higher model performance in predicting pupil dynamics during attentional set-shifting. Our findings suggest pupillary responses are coordinated with goal-oriented cognitive processing, providing a basis for modelling cognitive functions through pupillary dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.