Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368939›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Brain-Pupil Coupling Revealed Through Deep Learning of Intracranial Recordings.

Vicki Li, Simeon M Wong, Hrishikesh Suresh, Nebras M Warsi, Sebastian C Coleman, Karim Mithani, Hosni Abu Alhasan, Flavia Venetucci Gouveia, Puneet Jain, Ayako Ochi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Vicki LiProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-2091-4605
Simeon M WongProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Hrishikesh SureshProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Nebras M WarsiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sebastian C ColemanProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Karim MithaniProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Hosni Abu AlhasanDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Flavia Venetucci GouveiaProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Puneet JainDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ayako OchiDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Hiroshi OtsuboDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Lauren ShamDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Shelly WeissDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Rohit SharmaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Elizabeth N KerrDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
James T RutkaDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Elizabeth DonnerDepartment of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
George M IbrahimProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Abe Bresver Chair in Functional NeurosurgeryCIHR PJT-178279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pupillary responses are windows into human cognition, but their neural substrates are poorly understood. We studied brain-pupil coupling through intracranial recordings and pupillometry in 13 children and youth with epilepsy (ages 9-18) during an attentional set-shifting task. Time-resolved mixed-effects modelling identified associations between pupil diameter, neural activity and cognitive performance. We first showed that pupillary dynamics are closely linked to cognitive performance, with task-stage dependencies. Larger pupil sizes prior to stimulus onset were associated with faster reaction times, whereas smaller pupil sizes during and after stimulus presentation were linked to better performance. Next, linear models identified associations between band-limited power in task-relevant neural networks and pupil size changes during the task. Finally, deep learning models based on intracranial neural activity captured patterns predictive of changes in pupil size in five of seven participants that generalised to recordings from a separate day. Using salience-based gradient mapping, we identified a network of task-relevant cortical and subcortical regions whose engagement was consistently associated with higher model performance in predicting pupil dynamics during attentional set-shifting. Our findings suggest pupillary responses are coordinated with goal-oriented cognitive processing, providing a basis for modelling cognitive functions through pupillary dynamics.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainDeep LearningElectrocorticographyEpilepsyNerve NetPsychomotor PerformancePupilAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalecognitive processingepilepsypaediatricspupillometrySEEG

Identifiers

PMID41368939
PMCPMC12690414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.