Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368938›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026

What Can We Learn From Nurses' Experiences of Digital Technology Implementation During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Qualitative Study.

Dawn Dowding, Louise Newbould, Nicholas R Hardiker, Rebecca Randell, Manoj Mistry, Muhammad Faisal, Sarah Skyrme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawn DowdingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-8605
Louise NewbouldDepartment for Transport, UK Government, London, UK.
Nicholas R HardikerSchool of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Rebecca RandellFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Manoj MistryPatient and Public Contributor, Manchester, UK.
Muhammad FaisalFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Sarah SkyrmeCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Burdett Trust for Nursing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore nurses' experiences of the adoption, implementation, and use of digital technologies during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK.

designA qualitative descriptive study.

methodsA qualitative study using two data sources: qualitative responses from 55 respondents to an online survey, and data from in-depth interviews with 21 individuals. The NASSS framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

resultsRespondents reported using a variety of technologies including video conferencing applications, telemonitoring, systems to support care management and telecommunication systems. The analysis identified a range of reasons why technology had been introduced into services, and a recognition of its value in a situation where otherwise care may not have been able to continue. During the pandemic nurses were expected to change their work practices very rapidly, and we identified situations where organisational infrastructure either supported this effectively or created additional burdens for the nurses' work.

conclusionNurses had to adapt to new ways of working rapidly, with digital technology being one of the primary means through which communication and care were delivered. The Covid-19 pandemic provided a unique set of circumstances where layers of governance and many of the existing barriers to technology introduction were reduced. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: It is important to learn from these experiences, to understand how to sustain innovations that have proved to be successful, as well as the factors that enable nurses to work effectively in this new environment. REPORTING

methodThis study adheres to the guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A public contributor was involved from the beginning of the study conceptualization. They had input into the study approach, were part of the team that acquired the funding for the study and gave input at various stages into the processes for data collection, analysis and writing up the findings. The public contributor is a co-author on this paper and has been involved in the writing and editing of this report.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Digital TechnologyAdultFemaleHumansMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United KingdomCOVID‐19digital technologynursingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41368938
PMCPMC12964503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.