ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2026
Characterizing Paratesticular Neoplasms in Proteus Syndrome.
Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and imaging analysis of Proteus syndrome: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteus syndrome is a rare mosaic overgrowth disorder caused by somatic activating variants in AKT1 , most commonly the c.49G>A p.(Glu17Lys) variant. It predisposes individuals to asymmetric tissue proliferation and an elevated risk for both benign and malignant neoplasms. Among 64 males with genetically confirmed Proteus syndrome enrolled in a longitudinal natural history study, 12 (19%) underwent surgery for paratesticular masses. The average age at surgery was 9 years, most tumors were unilateral, small (median 1.6 cm), and slow growing, but 50% showed recurrence or metachronous tumor development, occasionally with progression to more atypical histology. Histologically, these tumors demonstrated a broad spectrum of differentiation. Eight reviewed cases included Müllerian-type papillary cystadenomas and low-grade papillary adenocarcinomas, a Brenner tumor, and one case of a papillary adenocarcinoma with spindle cell transformation. The epithelial components were typically arranged in papillary and glandular architectures, with variable degrees of cytologic atypia. Psammomatous calcifications were common. Immunohistochemistry showed consistent expression of PAX8(7/7), WT1(7/7), estrogen receptor (ER)(7/7), and progesterone receptor (PR)(6/7), supporting Müllerian lineage, while negative staining for germ cell and mesothelial markers excluded common paratesticular differential diagnoses. Four of the 7 tumors were positive for SF-1. All 7/7 sequenced tumors harbored the AKT1 c.49G>A variant with no additional oncogenic alterations identified by exome sequencing. This series is the largest series to date documenting the clinicopathologic features of paratesticular tumors, a poorly understood component of the Proteus syndrome phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.