ArticleMedical education online2025
Development of clinical teaching competency framework and scale for physician teachers in China: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.
Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and Validation of a Clinical Teaching Performance Checklist in Anesthesia Education: A Kane-Based Approach.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician teachers (PT) play a vital role in professional health education. However, there is a lack of a theoretical framework to direct PT faculty development in China. Therefore, this study was designed to develop and validate a clinical teaching competency framework and scale (CTCS) for physicians in China. This mixed-methods study began with qualitative interviews and a Delphi process to develop an initial framework and a pretest version of the Clinical Teaching Competency Scale (CTCS). Using convenience and random sampling, 450 physician teachers (PTs) were selected as the prediction sample. A national survey involving 3,179 PTs from seven administrative regions in Mainland China served as the validation sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess construct validity. Seven dimensions were identified. Namely, intellectual literacy, clinical curriculum teaching competence, clinical practice teaching competence, role modeling, clinical teaching choice ability, clinical teaching emotional ability, and clinical teaching independent development ability. These explained 70.513% of the total variance. The final scale comprised 54 items, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.987. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices: RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.038, and GFI, NFI, IFI, TLI, and CFI all > 0.9. Construct reliability (CR) for each dimension exceeded 0.9, and average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.672 to 0.832, indicating strong reliability and validity. A pyramid model with seven domains and 54 items was developed using a mixed-methods approach. This framework can guide the training of physician teachersand ultimately support health and well-being. The CTCS demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing the clinical teaching competence of physician teachers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.