Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368880›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026

Charting the content of data monitoring committee charters for clinical trials.

Lisa Eckstein, Akram Ibrahim, Olivia Orr, Annette Rid, Seema K Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa EcksteinFaculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-7521
Akram IbrahimAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Olivia OrrAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Annette RidDepartment of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Seema K ShahAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7726-1186

Funding

Issues in Research EthicsZIACL010541 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI KIM, SCOTT · 2015 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL010541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData monitoring committees play a critical role in ensuring the ethical conduct of clinical trials. Data monitoring committee charters set out the role and processes for data monitoring committees in monitoring clinical trials; however, little is known about the information charters contain.

methodsWe conducted a summative content analysis of a convenience sample of data monitoring committee charters based on the criteria set out for charters by the DAMOCLES Study Group in 2005. Thirteen charters from public and commercially sponsored clinical trials were obtained for review.

resultsAlthough the data monitoring committee charters we analyzed broadly satisfied the criteria set out by the DAMOCLES Study Group, some issues warrant further attention. These included variability in the availability of unmasked data for review, communication across data monitoring committees for related trials, post-trial DMC responsibilities, and a need for more explicit decision-making processes and conflict resolution procedures. Moreover, few of the data monitoring committee charters we were able to analyze included legal protection for members.

conclusionDespite limitations due to the difficulties in obtaining data monitoring committee charters, the convenience sample reviewed suggests variability, including in terms of implementation of some best-practice recommendations. There is a need for further exploration of these issues in a larger sample size. Undertaking such research would be assisted by requiring or incentivizing public access to data monitoring committee charters.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials Data Monitoring CommitteesDecision MakingHumansdata monitoringData monitoring committeesresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID41368880
PMCPMC12841360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.