Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization With In Situ Laser Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Complicated or High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection: Results of the LLTEVAR Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03845829 (Left Subclavian Artery Reconstruction With Laser-assisted Fenestration During the Procedure of Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Left Subclavian Artery Reconstruction With Laser-assisted Fenestration During the Procedure of Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antegrade delivery of a thoracic endovascular stent graft via axillary access with retrograde in situ laser fenestrations.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Integrated system combining cerebral protection and active steering directional puncture for thoracic aortic in situ fenestration.JVS-vascular science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) increases the risk of major adverse events (MAEs). In situ laser-assisted fenestration allows for LSA revascularization in both elective and urgent settings, yet its safety and efficacy lack robust multicenter data.
methodsLLTEVAR (LSA Revascularization With Laser-Assisted Fenestration During TEVAR) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that enrolled patients with acute complicated or high-risk acute TBAD. The primary safety end point was freedom from composite MAEs (mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, paraplegia, type Ia endoleak, and retrograde aortic dissection/intramural hematoma) within 30 days after the procedure. Univariate and multivariable analyses identified risk factors for composite MAEs.
resultsA total of 100 patients (mean age, 60.5±12.6 years) were enrolled at 5 vascular centers between July 2018 and September 2021. The technical success rate of LSA fenestration was 98.0% (98/100). The 30-day primary safety end point was 86.0%. Complicated TBAD (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.05-15.59;
conclusionIn situ laser-assisted fenestration for LSA revascularization during TEVAR demonstrates favorable procedural success and acceptable short-term outcomes in patients with acute TBAD. However, periprocedural MAEs remain a critical consideration, particularly in those with complicated TBAD with type II/III aortic arch anatomy. Further studies with comparative groups and long-term follow-up are warranted to validate these outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT03845829.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.