ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2025
Foot Temperature Measurement in People With Diabetes: Validation of a Non-Contact Thermal Device.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot temperature monitoring can prevent diabetic foot ulceration (DFU). This technical report determined the validity of the Feetsee device (InvCam) in measuring temperature differences between feet compared with current reference standard: FlirA615, with Food and Drug Administration-approved TotalVision software (RefCam).
methodsMeasurements were taken in 107 participants (mean age: 48 years; 49% female) across three groups: people with diabetes and active foot ulcer (DFU, n = 38; 57 ± 12.2 years), diabetes without ulcers (diabetes mellitus DM, n = 35; 51.5 ± 16.3 years), and healthy young controls without diabetes (C, n = 34; 34.2 ± 10.7 years).
resultsStrong agreement was shown in foot temperature measurements between the devices with no systematic bias, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 and typical error of 0.31 deg.
conclusionsThe InvCam system demonstrated validity for foot temperature measurement compared with the current reference standard and offers the advantage over current systems of being non-contact, eliminating the risk of infection and cross-contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.