Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

On Acoustic Voice Quality Index measurement reliability in digital health applications: a narrative review and empirical evaluation of speech sample length requirements.

Fredrik Nylén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fredrik NylénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a widely adopted tool for assessing dysphonia, incorporating sustained vowel and continuous speech samples to enhance ecological validity. Despite its broad use, the reliability of AVQI measurements, particularly in digital health applications, remains underexplored. This study aims to review the literature on AVQI's development and validation from the perspective of internal consistency of acoustic measurements, and to assess the amount of speech required to reliably determine the AVQI of a voice recording. Two sub-studies are described. Study 1: A narrative review was conducted using Google Scholar and Scopus to identify studies mentioning "AVQI" and "reliability". Key methodological details were extracted from studies reporting AVQI measurements, summarized, and discussed in terms of how the internal consistency of acoustic measurements was ensured across studies where AVQI had been validated or applied. Study 2: Recordings of read and spontaneous speech as well as sustained vowels produced by 54 native Swedish speakers (22 female, 32 male; age range: 46-78 years) were assessed in terms of the amount of speech required to obtain a reliable acoustic measurement of the speakers' voices. Simulations were performed using read and spontaneous speech materials of varying lengths. The variability in AVQI and its sub-measures was analyzed relative to the length (in words or in seconds) of continuous speech included. The result of study 1 shows that out of 129 identified studies, 85 reported on AVQI measurements. The review highlighted substantial variability in continuous speech lengths used across studies, ranging from 4-200 words. A recommendation of 3 s of voiced segments was often adhered to, but was found to lack sufficiently robust grounding. The simulations indicated that AVQI achieves internal consistency at speech lengths of approximately 50 words (or 20 s), which is longer than the current recommendation. Both read and spontaneous speech provided stable AVQI measurements at these speech lengths. AVQI thresholds obtained using speech lengths shorter than 50 words (20 s) may require re-evaluation. Robust standardization of continuous speech lengths is essential for the successful adoption of AVQI in digital health applications.

Indexed as

AVQIdysphonia assessmentnarrative reviewreliabilitysimulation study

Identifiers

PMID41368660
PMCPMC12682815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.