Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Exploring the Potential Causal Relationship of Galectin Levels and Gynecologic Cancers: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Hongguo Dong, Sipei Nie, Na Ni, Ling Guo, Qiaoling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongguo Dong *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100, People's Republic of China.
Sipei Nie *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100, People's Republic of China.
Na NiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100, People's Republic of China.
Ling GuoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100, People's Republic of China.
Qiaoling LiuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported the correlation between single galectin levels and gynecologic cancers. The present study used the Mendelian randomization (MR) technique to evaluate the causal relationship between galectin levels and gynecologic cancers. Methods: Data on galectin levels (3394 individuals of the Gal-3 dataset, 3301 individuals of Gal-1, Gal-2, Gal-4, Gal-7, Gal-8, Gal-9, and Gal-10 datasets) and gynecologic cancers were obtained from the IEU Open genome-wide association study (GWAS) project, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and FinnGen consortium. Two-sample MR was performed to determine the causal relationship between galectin levels and gynecologic cancers. Meanwhile, a bi-directional MR analysis was also conducted to examine the direction of the causal relations. The results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Gal-3 (OR=1.001, 95% CI: 1.000-1.001) and Gal-8 (OR=1.001, 95% CI: 1.000-1.002) may indicate small effects on cervical cancer. Gal-1 was suggested as risk factors for ovarian cancer (OR=1.108, 95% CI: 1.033-1.188), high grade serous ovarian cancer (OR=1.106, 95% CI: 1.019-1.202), and invasive mucinous ovarian cancer (OR=1.279, 95% CI: 1.041-1.573). Gal-9 showed modest effect in ovarian cancer (OR=1.070, 95% CI: 1.000-1.144), but significantly associated with an elevated risk of mucinous ovarian cancer (OR=1.242, 95% CI: 1.015-1.520). Gal-10 was suggested as a protective factor against ovarian cancer (OR=0.929, 95% CI: 0.867-0.994) and clear cell ovarian cancer (OR=0.803, 95% CI: 0.653-0.987). Gal-2 (OR=0.779, 95% CI: 0.654-0.929) and Gal-4 (OR=0.786, 95% CI: 0.639-0.966) were found as protective factors for malignant neoplasm of corpus uteri. Gal-2 (OR=0.921, 95% CI: 0.851-0.997) and Gal-10 (OR=0.892, 95% CI: 0.815-0.977) were suggested as protective factors against endometrial cancer (endometrioid histology). Similarly, higher Gal-4 was also associated with decreased risk of endometrial cancer (OR=0.902, 95% CI: 0.840-0.969) and endometrial cancer (endometrioid histology) (OR=0.846, 95% CI: 0.778-0.920). Conclusion: The study explored potential causal relationships between galectin levels and gynecologic cancers. While some associations were modest, the consistent directionality across sensitivity analyses and the biological plausibility of galectins in tumor immunology suggest that these proteins warrant further investigation as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Future research should validate these findings in clinical cohorts and explore underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

galectingynecologic cancersMendelian randomizationprotective factorrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID41368656
PMCPMC12682923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.