ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice
Evaluating the Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Oncology Drug Repurposing Efforts.
Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Processes and Artificial Intelligence in Generating Candidates for Oncology Drug Repurposing: Three-Year Scoping Review of Data.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate how machine learning (ML) contributes to drug repurposing efforts in oncology, considering the pharmaceutical industry's mounting R and D inefficiencies and economic pressures. Through qualitative interviews with experts across artificial intelligence, oncology, and pharmaceutical development, this paper explores the real-world applications of ML in this field, the challenges to its implementation, and its future potential to streamline drug discovery. Methods: This study employed the "research onion" framework (Saunders Findings: Three major thematic domains emerged: The technological, regulatory, and business landscapes. Technological challenges included poor data quality, limited accessibility to real-world datasets, and the need for robust infrastructure to support predictive modeling. Regulatory barriers are centered on ethical concerns in data governance and the difficulty of securing exclusivity and market protection for repurposed drugs. From a business perspective, profitability concerns, generic competition, and fragmented data ownership underscored the need for more collaborative and economically sustainable models. Conclusion: ML offers potential for oncological drug repurposing, but realizing its benefits requires addressing key technological, regulatory, and economic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.