ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Assessing Breastfeeding and Family-Centered Care: A Delphi-Based Scale and Its Prediction of Child Psychological Status.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate the Breastfeeding and Family-Centered Care Assessment Scale (ScaleSc) utilizing the Delphi method and to examine its association with child psychological status. Methods: Children aged 6-14 years were enrolled as study participants. Through multiple rounds of structured expert consultation, a comprehensive scale encompassing core elements of breastfeeding practices and family-centered care was systematically developed. Concurrently, support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree models were constructed utilizing ScaleSc scores alongside other relevant clinical characteristics of the participants. Results: Multivariate modeling identified higher ScaleSc scores as a significant protective factor against poor psychological status, with the scale demonstrating substantial predictive importance within both computational models. Furthermore, exposure to school bullying (SchBull) emerged as a potent risk factor, exhibiting a markedly elevated odds ratio (OR) of 43.982 within the logistic regression analysis, highlighting its profound detrimental impact on child psychological well-being. The study robustly confirmed the significant influence of breastfeeding practices and family-centered care on child psychological development, demonstrating the ScaleSc's efficacy in quantitatively linking these critical early-life factors to psychological outcomes. Conclusion: This research successfully developed and clinically validated the ScaleSc, establishing its significant utility for assessing child psychological status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.