Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Carbapenem-resistant

Ramya Juliet, Ramesh Nachimuthu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramya JulietAntibiotic Resistance and Phage Therapy Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Research in Bacteriophage and Infectious Diseases, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramesh NachimuthuAntibiotic Resistance and Phage Therapy Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Research in Bacteriophage and Infectious Diseases, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: A total of 145 clinical isolates of Results: Disk diffusion revealed that 73% of isolates were multidrug-resistant. MIC testing showed high resistance to meropenem (71%), colistin (61%), and tigecycline (43%). PCR analysis detected Discussion: These findings highlight the convergence of antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and biofilm-forming capacity in

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTigecyclineVirulenceVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsTigecyclineVirulence Factorsantimicrobial resistancebiofilmshypermucoviscoushypervirulentKlebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID41368433
PMCPMC12682828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.