ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Mid-term outcomes of a modified prosthetic aortic valve implantation technique for prosthetic valve endocarditis complicated by aortic annular abscess.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) complicated by complex paraannular aortic abscess remains a surgical challenge. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of a standardized, patch-free, supra-annular aortic valve replacement strategy that avoids complete root replacement in these high-risk patients. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 70 consecutive patients treated between 2015 and 2023 for complex aortic PVE using a consistent surgical protocol: radical debridement, supra-annular prosthetic valve implantation, inside the Valsalva sinuses, and external felt reinforcement-without annular or root patching. Follow-up included annual clinical and echocardiographic assessment (mean duration, 5.2 ± 1.3 years). The primary endpoint was freedom from the composite of reinfection or aortic reoperation. Secondary endpoints included survival, valve performance, and predictors of late adverse events. Results: Hospital mortality was 5.7% (n = 4 of 70). At 5 years, overall survival was 86.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.0%-93.9%), and freedom from reinfection or aortic reoperation was 89.2% (95% CI, 82.1%-96.2%). Outcomes were comparable between the original (n = 47) and expanded (n = 23) cohorts (log-rank Conclusions: Patch-free supra-annular valve replacement offers durable infection control and excellent hemodynamic outcomes, avoiding the need for complete root replacement in complex aortic PVE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.