Trial reportJTCVS techniques2025
Real-time margin assessment for video-assisted thoracic surgery: A pilot clinical trial.
Trial report in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumour Localisation Technologies in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review of Marking and Detection Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To accurately provide real-time intraoperative guidance on margins despite significant lung deformation. With lung cancer screening programs, smaller, early-stage lung nodules are being detected. Sublobar resection of peripheral small nodules is noinferior to lobar resection in terms of disease-free recurrence and long-term survival while preserving healthy lung function. However, accurately ensuring sufficient resection margin is challenging. Methods: A novel navigation system with a tumor marker (J-bar), surgical stapler instrumented with a position sensor, and software to compute the distances in real time has been developed and utilized during surgery to resect lung cancer. The software measurement of the J-bar to the tip of the stapler cutline (J-bar-tip) was compared with the distance measured from the resected sample in pathology. The aim was to establish the safety and feasibility of intraoperative use. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study; 3 procedures were not included. For the 22 procedures: average nodule size = 17.5 mm, pleural surface distance = 8.0 mm with 5 nodules >20 mm from the surface. All patients underwent complete nodule resection. The median time to place the J-bar was 2.8 minutes and to clamp the sensorized surgical stapler at the first staple line was 1.8 minutes. There was a significant correlation between the software readings and the pathological J-bar-tip readings. There were no study-related anticipated or unanticipated adverse events related to the device. Conclusions: The safety and feasibility of using this novel navigation system to provide intraoperative distance from the J-bar to the stapler has been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.