Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368339›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025

A single-center retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic

Ayoung Kang, Soo-Hong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayoung KangDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-959X
Soo-Hong KimDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-5969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cysts (CC) has become increasingly popular in pediatric surgical practice in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic CC excision in pediatric patients by comparing its outcomes with those of open surgery at a national children's hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients aged <19 years who underwent CC excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy between 2010 and 2024 at our center. The patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and their clinical and perioperative outcomes were compared. Variables included demographics, clinical characteristics, operative details, and preoperative and postoperative laboratory findings. Results: Seventy-nine patients (17 boys and 62 girls) were included, of whom 33 (41.8%) underwent laparoscopic excision, and 46 underwent open surgery. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the groups in terms of laboratory parameters or the incidence of cholangitis and pancreatitis. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (322.3 ± 63.3 minutes Conclusion: Laparoscopic CC excision is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery in pediatric patients. Although the operation was initially longer, it decreased with accumulated surgical experience. This study shows that laparoscopic CC excision can be safely and effectively implemented in a national children's hospital located outside the capital region, supporting its broader application across diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

Choledochal cystLaparoscopyLearning curvePediatricsTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41368339
PMCPMC12685456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.