ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
A single-center retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cysts (CC) has become increasingly popular in pediatric surgical practice in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic CC excision in pediatric patients by comparing its outcomes with those of open surgery at a national children's hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients aged <19 years who underwent CC excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy between 2010 and 2024 at our center. The patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and their clinical and perioperative outcomes were compared. Variables included demographics, clinical characteristics, operative details, and preoperative and postoperative laboratory findings. Results: Seventy-nine patients (17 boys and 62 girls) were included, of whom 33 (41.8%) underwent laparoscopic excision, and 46 underwent open surgery. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the groups in terms of laboratory parameters or the incidence of cholangitis and pancreatitis. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (322.3 ± 63.3 minutes Conclusion: Laparoscopic CC excision is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery in pediatric patients. Although the operation was initially longer, it decreased with accumulated surgical experience. This study shows that laparoscopic CC excision can be safely and effectively implemented in a national children's hospital located outside the capital region, supporting its broader application across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.