Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368327›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis in the United States: a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data.

Xiao Xu, Ekaterina Maslova, Danuta Kielar, Heide Stirnadel-Farrant, Juliana Meyers, Mirna Chehade, Rohit Katial, Stephanie Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao XuBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Ekaterina MaslovaBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Danuta KielarBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Heide Stirnadel-FarrantBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Juliana MeyersReal-World Data & Analytics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Mirna ChehadeMount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Rohit KatialBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-2467
Stephanie Y ChenBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, 101 Orchard Ridge Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2415-1499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by eosinophil infiltration into the esophageal tissue and esophageal dysfunction. In the United States, EoE has an estimated prevalence of 26-163 cases per 100,000 people. Real-world data concerning the clinical burden of EoE and treatment patterns in the United States are limited. Objectives: To describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, symptoms, comorbidities, treatment pathways, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with EoE in the United States. Design: Retrospective analysis. Methods: A study of pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with incident EoE (full incident EoE cohort) using Merative™ MarketScan Results: The full incident EoE cohort included 20,290 patients (62.61% were male; median (range) age was 38 (1-93) years); 13,710 patients (matched incident EoE cohort) were matched to 54,727 patients without EoE (matched control cohort). During baseline in the full incident EoE cohort, the most common comorbidities within the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were chronic pulmonary disease (19.79%), hypertension (15.77%), and depression (9.71%); the most common non-CCI comorbidities were reflux esophagitis (38.84%), allergic rhinitis (19.14%), and depression/anxiety (19.07%). During follow-up, the most frequently reported symptoms were acid reflux/heartburn (56.02%), dysphagia (51.89%), and abdominal pain (30.50%). The most common medications first observed were proton pump inhibitors (42.51%) and oral corticosteroids (12.26%). Overall, a larger proportion of the matched incident EoE cohort had visits to any healthcare setting during baseline and follow-up than the matched control cohort. Correspondingly, the annualized, all-cause healthcare costs per patient were higher in the matched incident EoE cohort than in the matched control cohort at baseline (mean (standard deviation), $10,185 ($29,455); median, $3248 vs $4906 ($20,601); $632) and during follow-up ($15,103 ($35,484); $6708 vs $5200 ($21,314); $651). Conclusion: Considerable disease burden is experienced by patients with EoE (before and after diagnosis), which contributes to a high level of HCRU and increased costs.

Indexed as

costseosinophilic esophagitishealthcare resource utilizationtreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID41368327
PMCPMC12682994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.