ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Spontaneous ureteral rupture during pregnancy: a case report and literature review.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous ureteral rupture is a rare and emergent urological entity, with limited literature guiding its diagnosis and management. Its non-specific presentation can lead to delayed recognition, posing risks of severe complications such as urinoma, sepsis, and renal failure. Currently, there is limited experience regarding the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous ureteral rupture during pregnancy. Herein, we present a case to illustrate effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for managing this rare but potentially life-threatening condition. Case Description: We present a 38-year-old woman at 25 weeks' gestation who presented with acute left flank pain and nausea. Initial ultrasonography revealed bilateral hydronephrosis without evidence of urolithiasis. Non-contrast magnetic resonance urography (MRU) confirmed discontinuity of the left upper ureter wall and perirenal fluid collection. Given the significant urinary extravasation and concerns about retrograde access, percutaneous nephrostomy was performed to prevent infection and preserve renal function. She remained stable throughout pregnancy and underwent an elective cesarean section at 35 weeks. Postpartum antegrade urography at 8 weeks demonstrated a patent ureter, and the nephrostomy tube was subsequently removed without complications. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider spontaneous ureteral rupture as a differential diagnosis of abdominal pain during pregnancy, even in the absence of calculi. Repeated ultrasonography and MRU are safe and effective imaging modalities for diagnosis of spontaneous ureteral rupture in pregnant patients. Percutaneous nephrostomy can serve as a viable, effective and minimally invasive strategy that protects renal function and ensures maternal-fetal safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.