Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368265›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

Global insights into the management of BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review of provider surveys.

Mohamad Abou Chakra, Igor Duquesne, Mahmoud Mima, Mohamad Moussa, Michael A O'Donnell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamad Abou ChakraDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Igor DuquesneDepartment of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Mahmoud MimaDepartment of Urology, University of Illinois Chicago, IL, USA.
Mohamad MoussaDepartment of Urology, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Michael A O'DonnellDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: As more clinicians adopt alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), understanding how these approaches are applied in practice is essential. To explore global treatment trends, we analyzed regional surveys on BCG-unresponsive NMIBC management. Methods: A structured literature review identified four published provider-based surveys, along with a fifth, unpublished survey conducted by our team in collaboration with Romanian colleagues. These included an international survey (January-May 2019) of 508 physicians from eight countries (Europe, Japan, and China); a 2022 U.S. national survey (n=259); and a regional Arab survey (October-November 2023; n=106 across 14 countries). Additional national surveys were conducted in Saudi Arabia (n=19; April-May 2024) and Romania (n=216; May-June 2025). Responses were grouped by key questions and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Key Content and Findings: For treating BCG-unresponsive disease, urologists in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia mainly followed guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA). Romanian urologists, by contrast, primarily adhered to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. Across Arab countries, practices reflected a mix of recommendations from the EAU, AUA/Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Treatment approaches for BCG-unresponsive disease varied widely across regions. Intravesical chemotherapy was most frequently used in the U.S. and China, whereas RC was the preferred option in Romania and many Arab countries. In Japan, clinicians favored watchful waiting, resection, and surveillance, with limited use of RC. European physicians similarly leaned toward conservative strategies, mirroring Japanese urologist approach. Preferences for intravesical chemotherapy agents differed by region: gemcitabine (Gem) was commonly used in the US and Arab countries; epirubicin and doxorubicin were favored in China; mitomycin C (MMC) was preferred in Europe. While most urologists were familiar with gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce), its actual use in clinical practice remained limited. Barriers to intravesical chemotherapy use in this setting were mainly due to unclear clinical guidelines. Notably, at the time of the surveys, newly Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies like nadofaragene and pembrolizumab were rarely used. Conclusions: Global practice patterns for BCG-unresponsive disease vary widely across regions, highlighting the need for a more unified, consensus-driven approach to the use of evolving bladder-sparing therapies and clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive (BCG-unresponsive)Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)practice patternsurveysurologists

Identifiers

PMID41368265
PMCPMC12683450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.