ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025
Magnetic resonance elastography for prostate cancer: advancing diagnostic accuracy, tumor characterization, and clinical applications.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond DNA damage: 3D tumor models and the integrin mechanobiology of radioresistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- Advances in basic research on post-cardiac arrest syndrome in adults: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The clinical course of PCa is constantly improving, with a trend toward ever greater precision diagnostics and less invasive methods. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), a novel modality for quantifying tissue stiffness, significantly enhances detection as a complement to conventional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Providing information about the mechanical properties of prostate tissue, MRE enhances the detection, localization, and characterization of malignant tumors, particularly those that are not optimally visualized with conventional methods. This review covers the underlying principles of MRE, its technological developments, such as tomoelastography, and its application in differentiating PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal parenchyma. Clinical studies have indicated that increased stiffness of the prostate gland may be associated with cancer aggressiveness, and MRE can be used to improve diagnostic performance when it is combined with mpMRI. Emerging technologies, such as radiomics, artificial intelligence-driven segmentation, and high-frequency driver systems, have created new possibilities for applying MRE in the diagnosis and follow-up of PCa and treatment. In conclusion, MRE can be a great complement to mpMRI, and could potentially improve diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring of PCa in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.