Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368194›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Removal of unwanted variation in pseudobulk analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data and the leveraging of pseudoreplicates.

Sofía Prieto León, Ewoud De Troyer, Helena Geys, Koen Van den Berge, Olivier Thas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofía Prieto LeónData Science Institute and I-BioStat, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5072-2411
Ewoud De TroyerStatistics and Decision Sciences, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-1373
Helena GeysData Science Institute and I-BioStat, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5347-9292
Koen Van den BergeStatistics and Decision Sciences, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-8478
Olivier ThasData Science Institute and I-BioStat, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-4089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removing unwanted variation (RUV) is key for accurate biological interpretation in high-throughput sequencing studies. However, no standardized approach exists for pseudobulked single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Improper implementation of RUV methods may remove biological information, jeopardizing power and false positive control in differential expression analysis. We evaluate the impact of three implementation strategies ('trails') in three RUV methods (RUV2, RUVIII, RUV4) using simulated and real biological signals in pseudobulked scRNA-seq data. Effects of technical noise under confounding and model misspecification conditions are also considered. Additionally, we introduce a novel strategy, RUVIII PBPS, to remove unwanted variation in pseudobulk differential expression analyses with insufficient technical replicates or negative control genes. Our analysis demonstrates that removing unwanted variation per cell type with RUV2 or RUVIII extracts factors associated with technical noise and controls the false discovery rate (FDR), even in the presence of confounding. RUVIII PBPS successfully controls the FDR when other standard RUV methods cannot be used due to missing technical replicates, dependence between the factor of interest and the sources of unwanted variation, and lack of plausible negative control genes.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingHumans

Identifiers

PMID41368194
PMCPMC12684399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.