ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The cost of exploitative leadership: how self-control depletion and organizational support shape employee outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Exploitative leadership, regarded as a manifestation of dark leadership, has recently attracted heightened academic interest because of its harmful consequences for employees. However, existing research has paid relatively little attention to the ways in which such leadership shapes critical employee outcomes, including intentions to leave and procrastination at work. Framed within conservation of resources theory, this study probes the latent pathways through which exploitative leadership erodes employee resources, precipitating both turnover intentions and procrastinatory conduct, while highlighting contextual levers that might temper these deleterious effects. Methods: To test the proposed hypotheses, we collected two-wave matched data from 296 full-time employees across various industries. Hierarchical regression and bootstrapping analyses were employed to assess the mediation and moderation effects. Results: The results unveiled that exploitative leadership precipitates heightened turnover intentions and procrastinatory behavior among employees, with self-control depletion operating as a pivotal mediator. Crucially, perceived organizational support functioned as a buffering mechanism, dampening both the impact of exploitative leadership on self-control depletion and its downstream indirect effects on turnover intention and workplace procrastination. Discussion: This study contributes to the growing literature on exploitative leadership and its consequences for employee attitudes and behaviors. It extends our understanding of the interactive effects between exploitative leadership and organizational support, and uncovers the critical role of self-control resources in shaping employees' withdrawal responses. Practical implications for organizational leaders are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.