ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Enhancing emotion recognition in virtual reality: a multimodal dataset and a temporal emotion detector.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion is a complex psychophysiological phenomenon elicited by external stimuli, exerting a profound influence on cognitive processes, decision-making, and social behavior. Emotion recognition holds broad application potential in healthcare, education, and entertainment. With virtual reality (VR) emerging as a powerful tool, it offers an immersive and controllable experimental environment. Prior studies have confirmed the feasibility and advantages of VR for emotion elicitation and recognition, and multimodal fusion has become a key strategy for enhancing recognition accuracy. However, publicly available VR multimodal emotion datasets remain limited in both scale and diversity due to the scarcity of VR content and the complexity of data collection. The shortage hampers further progress. Moreover, existing multimodal approaches still face challenges such as noise interference, large inter-individual variability, and insufficient model generalization. Achieving robust and accurate physiological signal processing and emotion modeling in VR environments thus remains an open challenge. To address the issues, we constructed a VR experimental environment and selected 10 emotion-eliciting video clips guided by the PAD(Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance) model. Thirty-eight participants (N=38) were recruited, from whom electrodermal activity, eye-tracking, and questionnaire data were collected, yielding 366 valid trials. The newly collected dataset substantially extends the publicly available VREED dataset, enriching VR-based multimodal emotion resources. Furthermore, we propose the MMTED model (Multi-Modal Temporal Emotion Detector), which incorporates baseline calibration and multimodal fusion of electrodermal and eye-tracking signals for emotion recognition. Experimental results demonstrate the strong performance of the MMTED model, achieving accuracies of 85.52% on the public VREED dataset, 89.27% on our self-collected dataset, and 85.29% on their combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.