Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41368144›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Intermittent versus continuous drought: chlorophyll

Jesús D Peco, Ana Centeno, Rubén Moratiel, Jaime Villena, Jesús A López-Perales, Marta M Moreno, David Pérez-López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jesús D PecoDepartamento de Producción Vegetal y Tecnología Agraria, ETSIA-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ana CentenoDepartamento de Producción Agraria, CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén MoratielDepartamento de Producción Agraria, CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime VillenaDepartamento de Producción Vegetal y Tecnología Agraria, ETSIA-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Jesús A López-PeralesDepartamento de Producción Vegetal y Tecnología Agraria, ETSIA-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Marta M MorenoDepartamento de Producción Vegetal y Tecnología Agraria, ETSIA-Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
David Pérez-LópezDepartamento de Producción Agraria, CEIGRAM-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent drought threatens Mediterranean tomato yields, yet how the time-scale of drought shapes photochemical tolerance remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated six genotypes, three commercial cultivars ('Sintonía', 'Marejada', 'Valenciano') and three Mediterranean landraces ('82', '264', '260', under greenhouse conditions. Plants received either two short pulses (WS1) or a single prolonged drought (WS2). We tracked stem water potential (Ψ Results: The first WS1 pulse transiently increased performance index (PI Discussion: Findings support a three-stage resilience model: (i) reversible photoprotective adjustment to short severe drought; (ii) cumulative photochemical damage under sustained deficit; and (iii) genotype-dependent recovery. Conclusion: Combining temporal stress integrals with OJIP screening provides a robust pipeline for breeding Mediterranean tomatoes adapted to future drought, advancing knowledge of drought resilience mechanisms.

Indexed as

chlorophyll a fluorescencedrought resilienceMediterranean landracesOJIP profilephotosystem IISolanum lycopersicumstress integralwater stress

Identifiers

PMID41368144
PMCPMC12683661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.