ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Quantitative measurement using panretinal optical coherence tomography with three-dimensional curve distortion correction.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion-corrected Gaussian, mean, and parametric curvature mapping of the posterior eye with pupil-tracked whole-eye OCT.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Field of View Across Widefield Retinal Imaging Systems.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Panretinal optical coherence tomography (PanOCT) enables rapid, widefield retinal imaging up to 140°, visualizing peripheral regions including the ora serrata. However, raw B-scan images exhibit curvature distortion, limiting quantitative accuracy. We present a curve correction method to restore geometric fidelity. Validation with a custom 3D-printed eye phantom showed average relative errors under 1%. Clinical comparisons with CT and ultrasound demonstrated errors of 2.78% and 5.97%, respectively. These results indicate strong agreement with standard imaging modalities and support the utility of PanOCT for accurate widefield retinal measurements in clinical and research applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.