ArticleJAACAP open2025
Wearable Signals for Diagnosing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents: A Feasibility Study.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable-Derived Axis-Specific Motor Signatures of ADHD Symptoms in Children and Adolescents.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Applying artificial intelligence in neurodevelopmental disorders management and research.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- ViT-BiLSTM Multimodal Learning for Paediatric ADHD Recognition: Integrating Wearable Sensor Data with Clinical Profiles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearables in ADHD: Monitoring and Intervention-Where Are We Now?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in children and adolescents. Diagnoses of ADHD often rely on subjective ratings from parents and teachers. This study investigated the feasibility of using objective activity monitoring data collected through wearable activity trackers for ADHD diagnosis and monitoring in adolescents. Method: A longitudinal study was conducted involving Chinese adolescents ages 16 to 17 years. Data collected included objective measures (movement acceleration, heart rate, and sleep patterns from passive actigraphy) and subjective measures (parent and self-reported questionnaires). Machine learning models were developed using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to compare various measures for ADHD classification. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to analyze the importance of different measures on ADHD risk. Results: The study included 30 adolescents (17 with ADHD and 13 without ADHD). Machine learning models using solely objective measures achieved high predictability in classifying ADHD (AUC = 0.844) and ADHD medication status (AUC = 1.000). Models integrating both subjective and objective measures showed enhanced performance (AUC = 0.933). In this sample, key features for ADHD classification included irritability, sex, and quality-of-life indicators; key features for ADHD medication use classification included heart rate and physical activity intensity. Conclusion: Although the sample size was small, actigraphy-based monitoring provides a noninvasive and granular measurement of objective vital signs of adolescents. If validated in larger samples, the incorporation of objective measures is likely to enhance multidimensional assessment and diagnostic accuracy in adolescents with ADHD, supplementing existing diagnostic methods. Study preregistration information: A systematic review of anhedonia and amotivation in depression and cannabis use; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; CRD42023422438.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.