ArticleJAACAP open2025
Exposure-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Youth Anxiety Disorders: Superiority Over Relaxation-Based Comparator and Predictors of Response.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02810171 (Dimensional Brain Behavior Predictors of CBT Outcomes in Pediatric Anxiety), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dimensional Brain Behavior Predictors of CBT Outcomes in Pediatric Anxiety
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech-Derived Digital Markers of Treatment Response and Improvement Trajectories in Pediatric Anxiety.Research square · 2026Article
- Editors' Best of 2025.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- Connectivity between the central executive and salience networks normalizes with exposure-focused CBT in pediatric anxiety.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evidence supports exposure-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (EF-CBT) for child and adolescent anxiety disorders, but protocols comparing EF-CBT with other therapy modalities (eg, relaxation) are understudied, and little is known about predictors of EF-CBT response. Extending an interim report, this study compared EF-CBT with an active comparator, relaxation and mentorship training (RMT), and examined predictors of EF-CBT response. Method: Participants were 139 youths with transdiagnostic anxiety disorders (age range 7-18 years, mean age 12.3). Sample demographics were male, 24.5%; female, 75.5%; Asian, 0.7%; Black, 5.8%; multiracial, 0.7%; other, 0.7%; other Pacific Islander, 11.5%; unknown, 2.9%; White, 77.7%; 5.8% Hispanic/Latino. Participants were randomized (2:1 ratio) to 12 sessions of EF-CBT (n = 94) or RMT (n = 45). Treatment response was determined by independent evaluator ratings on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. Results: EF-CBT was associated with 3.53 higher odds of treatment response based on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (EF-CBT 47.1%, RMT 20.1% response rate) whether delivered in person or via teletherapy. Notably, age moderated EF-CBT response, such that younger age predicted better outcomes ( Conclusion: As expected, EF-CBT was more effective than the RMT comparator. Greater improvement in younger patients receiving EF-CBT suggests that response to exposure may be developmentally sensitive. Clinical Trial Registration Information: Dimensional Brain Behavior Predictors of CBT Outcomes in Pediatric Anxiety (Anxiety-CBT); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02810171.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.