Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367974›Full record

ArticleJAACAP open2025

Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Constructs of Acute and Potential Threat Differentially Associate With Pediatric Anxiety.

Stefanie R Russman Block, Hannah C Becker, Dana E Díaz, Elizabeth R Duval, D Angus Clark, Dareen Al-Qawasmeh, Alexis Walker-VanSingel, Kristin A Mannella, K Luan Phan, Christopher S Monk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefanie R Russman BlockUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hannah C BeckerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dana E DíazColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Elizabeth R DuvalUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
D Angus ClarkUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dareen Al-QawasmehUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Alexis Walker-VanSingelUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kristin A MannellaUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
K Luan PhanOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Christopher S MonkUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kate D FitzgeraldColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To address problems with the current categorical diagnostic classification system for mental health, the National Institute of Mental Health created the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, which encourages researchers to link dimensionally assessed psychological constructs with transdiagnostic psychopathology to expedite discovery of biological mechanisms and clinical translation. Two constructs that were theorized by the RDoC to be pertinent to anxiety symptoms across categorical anxiety disorders and the spectrum of severity are acute threat (AT; fear of a present danger) and potential threat (PT; anxiety about a distant or uncertain danger). However, these constructs are often conflated in research and lack valid self-report measures, especially among youth. Method: The present study examined how self-reported AT and PT distinctly associate with the following: (1) dimensional anxiety symptom severity, and (2) neural response to threat, among youth 7 to 17 years of age with clinically significant anxiety (ie, anxiety disorder diagnosis, n = 119) and those with subclinical to no anxiety (ie, no anxiety disorder diagnosis, n = 41). AT and PT scores were derived from 3 self/parent-report measures of youth anxiety; expert consensus was used to designate each item as indexing either AT or PT, followed by a generation of AT and PT general factor scores from bifactor models fit to clinical experts' ratings. Anxiety severity was assessed with a structured clinical interview using the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale. Neural response to threat was measured using the Emotional Faces Shifted Attention Task, performed during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, AT and PT factor scores were tested as predictors of clinical anxiety severity and neural activation to threat. Results: AT factor scores positively associated with clinically assessed anxiety severity and right posterior insula response to threat faces across the whole sample. PT factor scores also associated with greater clinician-measured anxiety severity, but only among participants with subclinical to no anxiety, and did not associate with brain activity. Conclusion: Results support the RDoC theory that AT and PT are distinct and clinically relevant constructs that can be assessed via youth self-report. Understanding how AT and PT uniquely relate to anxiety severity may contribute to the development of targeted anxiety treatment and prevention for youth by elucidating which domains of functioning specifically contribute to disorder heterogeneity or symptom severity. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group.

Indexed as

acute threatanxietypediatricpotential threatRDoC

Identifiers

PMID41367974
PMCPMC12684446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.