ArticleJAACAP open2025
Online Racial Discrimination and Suicidal Ideation Among Latine Adolescents.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathways Linking Racial Discrimination to Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Adolescents.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- Online Racial/Ethnic Discrimination, Suicidal Ideation, and Alcohol Misuse Among Ethnoracially Minoritized College Students: The Roles of Internalized Racism and Ethnic Identity.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Momentary stress and social context among adolescents at risk for suicide: An experience sampling study.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Online racial discrimination (ORD) is a growing problem among Latine youth that may help explain their elevated risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The present study examined the relation between direct and indirect experiences of ORD on suicidal ideation in a nationally representative sample of Latine youth in the United States. Method: This cross-sectional study used data collected in 2020 to 2021 from the National Survey on Critical Digital Literacy, a population-based, mixed-methods study on the psychological impact of online racism experiences among US adolescents aged 11 to 19 years. Participants are self-identified Latine adolescents (N = 243; 56.8% male) inclusive of all racial backgrounds. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test the association between individual (ie, direct) and vicarious (ie, indirect) ORD and suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks. Results: Adjusting for demographics, hours spent online, and depression symptoms, findings from the logistic regression model showed that adolescents with higher levels of individual ORD had higher odds of endorsing suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.02-4.69) compared to those with lower levels. This association was not observed with vicarious ORD (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.50-1.43). Conclusion: Findings suggest that direct, but not indirect, exposures to ORD may confer elevated risk for thinking about suicide among Latine youth, above and beyond the effects of depression symptoms and hours spent online. Addressing direct ORD may help to improve the cultural responsiveness of youth suicide prevention strategies targeting Latine youth. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.