Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367963›Full record

ArticleJAACAP open2025

A Relational Agent Intervention for Adolescents Seeking Mental Health Treatment: Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial Within a Children's Outpatient Hospital.

Mary Margaret Gleason, Megan Flom, Stephanie Rapoport, Andre Williams, Autumn Birch, Nicole K Wells, Valerie Forman-Hoffman, Athena Robinson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05372913 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility and Acceptability of W-GenZD Versus CBT-light Teletherapy for Adolescents Seeking Mental Health Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05372913 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility and Acceptability of W-GenZD Versus CBT-light Teletherapy for Adolescents Seeking Mental Health Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorWoebot HealthRan2022 to 2023Enrolled141ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsWoebot for Adolescents (W-GenZD) Mobile Application, CBT-Lite Teletherapy Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary Margaret GleasonChildren's Hospital of The King's Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Megan FlomWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.
Stephanie RapoportWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.
Andre WilliamsWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.
Autumn BirchWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.
Nicole K WellsChildren's Hospital of The King's Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Valerie Forman-HoffmanWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.
Athena RobinsonWoebot Health, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite steady increases in the prevalence of depression and anxiety, many adolescents remain undertreated. Digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may address some barriers to care. This study is the first to examine the prospective noninferiority of a smartphone-based, self-guided relational agent (W-GenZD) DMHI to address adolescent depressive symptoms compared to group-based telehealth cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Method: Adolescents 13 to 17 years of age who were seeking treatment for depression and/or anxiety at a children's hospital outpatient mental health program and who met study inclusion criteria were randomized to either W-GenZD (n = 71) or CBT Group (n = 70). The primary aim was to examine feasibility and acceptability. The secondary aim was to test the noninferiority of W-GenZD compared to CBT Group on the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) at 4 weeks (end of treatment [EOT]). The study also examined the trajectory of working alliance, anxiety, general mood, and safety in each intervention group. Results: W-GenZD was noninferior to CBT Group in reducing depressive symptoms, with a mean between-group PHQ-8 EOT score difference of -0.67, 95% CI = - 2.30, 0.82 in intent-to-treat analysis (N = 141) using multiple imputation for missing values. Four different sensitivity analyses confirmed noninferiority, including per protocol analysis (-1.38, -3.61, 0.86, n = 82). Feasibility, acceptability, and tertiary aims were similar in both groups, and data support the safety of W-GenZD in a mental health outpatient setting. Conclusion: Results suggest that W-GenZD is a feasible and efficacious intervention for adolescents presenting with depression and/or anxiety in a real-world setting. W-GenZD could help expand the capacity of mental health clinicians to support the many youth and families in need of mental health care. Clinical trial registration information: Feasibility and Acceptability of W-GenZD vs CBT-light Teletherapy for Adolescents Seeking Mental Health Services; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05372913.

Indexed as

adolescent mental healthdigital mental healthnoninferiorityrandomized controlled trialrelational agent

Identifiers

PMID41367963
PMCPMC12684459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.