Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367960›Full record

ArticleJAACAP open2025

Planned Suicide Methods in Crisis Conversations: Effects of Age and Gender.

Ignacio J Tripodi, Greg Buda, Lili Török, Margaret Meagher, Elizabeth A Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ignacio J TripodiCrisis Text Line, New York, New York.
Greg BudaCrisis Text Line, New York, New York.
Lili TörökCrisis Text Line, New York, New York.
Margaret MeagherCrisis Text Line, New York, New York.
Elizabeth A OlsonCrisis Text Line, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Understanding demographic differences in planned suicide methods is key to prevention efforts, including means restriction. Although prior studies have identified gender differences in suicide methods, the stability vs emergence of those gender differences across age bands has not previously been examined. We aimed to identity stability or emergence of gender differences in planned suicide methods across development by testing for age by gender interactions, in a large cohort of crisis conversations. Method: We analyzed an archival dataset of 34,465 deidentified conversations from Crisis Text Line between January 5, 2017, and January 4, 2024. A total of 5,136 texters selected boy/man as the only applicable gender option, 23,387 selected only girl/woman, and 5,942 selected any other combination of gender identity options (transgender and gender diverse category [TGD]). Planned suicide methods were evaluated using a multi-step transformers-based natural language processing pipeline to extract and classify methods. Results: There were significant effects of age for each of the most common planned suicide methods (overdose, sharp objects, hanging, firearms, jumping, vehicles, poisoning, drowning, asphyxiation, and "other"). There were significant effects of gender for overdose, hanging, firearms, jumping, vehicles, poison, asphyxiation, and other. There were age by gender interactions for overdose: χ Conclusion: Gender effects differed across age groups for several of the most common suicide methods. These gender-specific age patterns present possibilities for targeted prevention efforts.

Indexed as

adolescencegendersuicide

Identifiers

PMID41367960
PMCPMC12684464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.