ArticleJAACAP open2025
Does Combined Stimulant and Psychosocial Treatment in Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Protect Against Future Substance Use?
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a risk factor for future substance use. Stimulant medication has largely failed to demonstrate protection against future substance use, but no studies have assessed whether combined stimulant and psychosocial treatment reduces future substance use compared with stimulants alone. Method: This retrospective study used data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a medical records repository in Olmsted County, Minnesota, to identify 1,541 children ≤7 years old who were prescribed a stimulant for ADHD between 2003 and 2019. Of children, 40% (n = 628) also received psychosocial treatment. Data on substance use after age 10 were gathered from the medical record until 2023, comprising up to 17 years of follow-up. Logistic regression compared substance use outcomes between the 2 treatment groups, and multivariable models identified childhood factors associated with future substance use. Results: Of 1,541 children with ADHD (median age = 6.0 years [interquartile range = 5.0, 7.0]; 1,111 [72%] boys, 1,225 [79%] White), 515 (33%) had documented substance use after age 10. Children who were older at initial treatment, had public insurance, had history of trauma, or had family history of substance use disorder diagnoses were more likely to use substances. Although children who received combined treatment were less likely than children who received stimulants alone to use tobacco/nicotine (21% vs 25%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.86, Conclusion: One-third of children with ADHD went on to use substances. Combined stimulant and psychosocial interventions at baseline were associated with lower risk of tobacco/nicotine use, but there was no difference in other substance use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.