ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Exploring EMDR: an innovative approach with Posner Paradigm to reprocessing negative memories in a non-clinical sample.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a structured psychotherapy primarily focused on treating individuals who have experienced distressing, traumatic events and other mental disorders. While traditionally associated with bilateral eye movements, the underlying mechanisms of EMDR remain a topic of interest. Our goal was to explore whether an endogenous attention task, specifically the Posner paradigm, which involves shifting spatial attention without eye movements, could be as effective as the conventional eye movements in processing distress memories of moderate to high intensity and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the technique. Methods: To achieve this, we conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 50 healthy participants, who were divided into two groups (EMDR and other engaging in Posner paradigm). Participants were tasked with recalling distress memories while undergoing their respective interventions. We measured the overall effects of both approaches on subjective units of distress (SUDs), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted to evaluate changes in these measures. Results: Our results indicated that both the EMDR and Posner groups experienced significant reductions in scores on the SUDs, IES-R, and PCL-5, demonstrating equal effectiveness in alleviating distress associated with distress memories. Notably, the results suggest that the mechanism of attention shifting, rather than the specific modality of eye movements, plays a critical role in the therapeutic process. Conclusion: These data suggest that endogenous visuospatial tasks, such as those employed in the Posner paradigm, may serve as viable alternatives to traditional eye movements in EMDR therapy. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the simultaneous presentation of stimuli may not be a crucial aspect of EMDR's effectiveness. This study contributes to the understanding of EMDR by highlighting the importance of attentional processes in memory processing and opens avenues for further research into alternative therapeutic techniques that leverage cognitive mechanisms. However, as this study employed a non-clinical sample of healthy participants with distress memories, caution is warranted when generalizing these findings to clinical populations with diagnosed trauma-related disorders. The implications of these findings are discussed within the broader theoretical frameworks of EMDR and attentional involvement, emphasizing the potential for integrating cognitive tasks into trauma-focused therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.