ArticleHemaSphere2025
Harmonization on defining B-cell recovery post CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: An international consensus statement.
Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAR T-cell Kinetics, Persistence, and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-cell ALL Treated with Obecabtagene Autoleucel in the FELIX Study.Cancer research communications · 2026Trial
- Article
- The evolving landscape of CAR T cell therapy in children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Concurrent MLL-AF4Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapse following CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CD19-CAR) remains a major barrier to long-term cure in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with nearly 50% of patients relapsing within 6 months. Early B-cell recovery (BCR), as detected by the re-emergence of CD19-positive cells, has been strongly associated with relapse risk and serves as a surrogate marker for loss of CAR T-cell persistence. However, clinical use of BCR is hindered by variability in monitoring practices, including inconsistent definitions, timing, and measurement across institutions. To address this gap, we convened an international working group of pediatric cellular therapy experts to establish a consensus definition for BCR. Our collaborative effort outlines standardized criteria for BCR assessment aimed at improving comparability across studies and guiding post-CAR T-cell surveillance strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.