ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Predicting Preoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning for predicting venous thromboembolism in septic shock patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) frequently occurs in the lower extremities of elderly hip - fracture patients. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine - learning model for predicting preoperative DVT risk in these patients and use the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to explain the model and identify significant factors. Methods: A total of 976 patients (38 variables) were included. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (N = 683) and a validation set (N = 293). The Synthetic Minority Over - sampling Technique (SMOTE) was used to balance the training set. Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) were applied to select influential factors, and Venn analysis was used to identify key variables. Five machine - learning techniques, including Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were used to develop a predictive model. The performance of various models was evaluated to find the optimal algorithm, and the SHAP method was used for interpretation. Results: A total of eight variables were selected as inputs for the predictive model. The XGBoost model achieved the highest performance on the training set data, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score of 0.975, 0.923, 0.936, 0.910, 0.909, 0.939, and 0.922, respectively. Furthermore, the calibration curve demonstrated a high level of agreement between the predicted probabilities and the observed risks, while the decision curve revealed that the XGBoost model had a higher net benefit compared to other machine learning models. Additionally, the use of the SHAP tool facilitated the interpretation of both the features and individual predictions. Conclusion: Interpretable predictive models can help implement timely interventions and assist physicians in accurately predicting preoperative DVT risk in elderly hip - fracture patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.