Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367880›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Clinical care processes for early postpartum haemorrhage diagnosis: a nested observational study within the E-MOTIVE trial.

Kristie-Marie Mammoliti, Fernando Althabe, Christina Easter, James Martin, Adam J Devall, Adeosun Love Funmi, Rahmatu Yusuf, Fatima Abubakar, Lolade Christiana Arigbede, JimKelly Mugambi and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Kristie-Marie MammolitiCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Fernando AlthabeThe UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)/Department of Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (LRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christina EasterCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
James MartinCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adam J DevallCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adeosun Love FunmiAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Rahmatu YusufAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Fatima AbubakarAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Lolade Christiana ArigbedeAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
JimKelly MugambiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Polycarp OyooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Masumbuko SambusaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Akwinata BandaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Fawzia SamuelsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sara WillemseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sibongile Doris KhambuleEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Hilal Mukhtar Shu'aibAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Aminu Ado WakiliAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Jenipher OkoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ard MwampashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mandisa Singata-MadlikiEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Edna ArendsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Elani MullerEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Hadiza GaladanciAfrican Center of Excellence for Population Health and Policy, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Zahida QureshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fadhlun Alwy Al-BeityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sue FawcusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Neil MoranKwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
George GwakoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Alfred OsotiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ioannis GallosThe UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)/Department of Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing (LRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Arri CoomarasamyNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality, particularly in low- and- middle-income countries. The E-MOTIVE trial demonstrated a 60% reduction in severe PPH and related complications with the E-MOTIVE intervention compared to usual care. This nested observational study explored clinical care practices between the time of vaginal birth and the removal of the obstetric drape. Specifically, we assessed the frequency of postpartum maternal assessments, including blood pressure, pulse, uterine tone, vaginal blood flow, and cumulative blood loss assessment-unique to the intervention. We also evaluated diagnostic methods, and blood loss thresholds used for PPH, and how these practices may have contributed to differences in PPH diagnosis and outcomes between E-MOTIVE intervention hospitals and usual care hospitals. Methods: This prospective observational study, nested within the E-MOTIVE trial, involved passive, direct observations of healthcare workers providing postpartum care to women and managing PPH across 78 hospitals in Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the frequency and timing of postpartum maternal assessments, diagnostic methods and blood loss thresholds used to diagnose PPH, comparing clinical practices between E-MOTIVE care and usual care. Results: Between June and December 2022, the study included 2,578 women at E-MOTIVE care hospitals and 2,834 at usual care hospitals. At E-MOTIVE hospitals, 88% (2,272/2,578) of women received at least one postpartum maternal assessment, 71% (1,825/2,578) at least two, 57% (1,479/2,578) at least three, and 48% (1,234/2,578) four, with assessments conducted earlier and more frequently than at usual care hospitals. Objective blood loss quantification improved diagnosis, with the most common method and blood loss threshold at E-MOTIVE hospitals being ≥300 mL plus at least one abnormal clinical sign, used in 47% (140/295) of PPHs. Postpartum haemorrhage was diagnosed earlier and more frequently at E-MOTIVE hospitals: 76% (223/295) within 30 min, 97% (287/295) within 60 min, and 100% 295/295) within 90 min (median: 17 min; IQR 11-30), compared to 54% (119/219), 79% (173/219), 96% (210/219) respectively, and 100% within 134 min in usual care (median: 26 min; IQR 13-56). Discussion: Frequent and timely postpartum maternal assessments, along with objective blood loss thresholds of with at least one abnormal clinical sign and ≥500 mL may enhance early PPH diagnosis. The first 90 min postpartum has been identified as a critical window for early diagnosis, termed the "Golden 90 min for PPH diagnosis." Incorporating these insights into clinical training and guidelines may support improved maternal outcomes related to PPH.

Indexed as

blood loss thresholdsdiagnostic methodsearly detectionmaternal postpartum assessmentspostpartum haemorrhage (PPH)

Identifiers

PMID41367880
PMCPMC12682830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.