Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367849›Full record

ReviewSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Opposing pathophysiological concepts in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome: The great MEWDS schism.

Carl P Herbort, Ioannis Papasavvas, Abdulrahman F Albloushi, De-Kuang Hwang, Vania Lages, Wen-Jung Lo, Kazuichi Maruyama, Marina Papadia, Masaru Takeuchi, Yoshihiko Usui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Indocyanine green angiography in uveitis.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carl P HerbortRetinal and Inflammatory Eye Diseases, Centre for Ophthalmic Specialised Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ioannis PapasavvasRetinal and Inflammatory Eye Diseases, Centre for Ophthalmic Specialised Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abdulrahman F AlbloushiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
De-Kuang HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, China.
Vania LagesUnidade Local de Saúde Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal, Taiwan.
Wen-Jung LoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kazuichi MaruyamaDepartment of Vision Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Marina PapadiaOspedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genova, Italy.
Masaru TakeuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Defence Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshihiko UsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) is a benign posterior uveitis involving the outer retina-choriocapillaris complex. The clinical picture, since its first description in 1984, is well-established. Classified at the benign end of the choriocapillaritis spectrum, including, among others, idiopathic multifocal choroiditis, serpiginous choroiditis, and acute posterior multifocal pigment epitheliopathy, a challenge to this classical choriocapillaritis classification of the disease was attempted, attributing the primary lesion process to a photoreceptoritis. The aim of this perspective and review article was to gather a sufficient body of evidence for a credible pathophysiological explanation of MEWDS. We reviewed the literature and integrated the results of some of our own studies on MEWDS. The crucial role of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and its correct interpretation is highlighted, giving clear indications that uptake failure of ICG by the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cannot explain ICGA hypofluorescence. In contrast to what is often claimed, ICGA hypofluorescence is already present in the early angiographic phases in MEWDS, speaking for a perfusion problem rather than the RPE nonuptake thesis. Hypoxic damage principally affects the photoreceptor cell but only minimally the RPE cell in MEWDS, explaining why primary photoreceptoritis has been privileged by some. The principles of optical coherence tomography angiography, being based on the presence of flow, it cannot detect the presence or absence of flow in low-flow end-capillaries and is, therefore, an inappropriate imaging modality for MEWDS. There is a continuum between MEWDS and other choriocapillaritis entities, which are all based on inflammatory choroidal circulatory dysfunctions of diverse severity, including MEWDS. We found a substantial body of evidence indicating that end-choriocapillaris nonperfusion is at the origin of MEWDS with limited secondary hypoxic damage mainly to the vulnerable photoreceptors and functional preservation of the metabolically more resistant RPE cell. As only small end-choriocapillary vessels are involved in MEWDS, spontaneous resolution of the disease occurs mostly without sequels.

Indexed as

Choriocapillaritisindocyanine green angiographymultiple evanescent white dot syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41367849
PMCPMC12685258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.