ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2025
Evaluation of the Combined Use of Elastography and Cervicometry With the E-Cervix Index to Predict Second Trimester Preterm Birth Risk.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive value of uterine electromyography coupled with transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment in women at risk of preterm delivery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preterm birth (PB) continues to be a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, with isthmic-cervical insufficiency (ICI) being among the most serious contributory factors. ICI is often a precursor for PB, and monitoring and diagnosis of this event can largely be achieved through cervicometry and elastography, especially with the use of the E-Cervix index. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of integrating elastography and cervicometry, specifically the E-Cervix index, in predicting PB risk in pregnant women with ICI during the second trimester. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed on 250 pregnant women during their second trimester, including 150 women with ICI alongside 100 control women. Cervical elastography was done to assess the stiffness of the cervix coupled with transvaginal ultrasound cervicometry to obtain the length of the cervix. The E-Cervix index was also computed to enhance the discrimination accuracy of lower predictive values. Analysis was done on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 27.0 and Statistical Software for Data Analysis version 17.0. Results: This study investigated the effectiveness of combining cervical elastography and cervicometry, utilizing the E-Cervix index, to assess the risk of PB in pregnant women diagnosed with ICI. The main group (n = 150) had a significantly younger mean age (30.24 ± 5.68 years) compared to the control group (32.17 ± 6.00 years, P = 0.011). Women with ICI showed shorter cervical lengths (2.6 ± 0.5 cm vs. 3.5 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001) and higher elasticity contrast index (6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). A significantly higher rate of PB (16% vs. 8%, P = 0.047) was observed in the main group. However, early diagnosis through combined elastography and cervicometry, followed by timely interventions, effectively contributed to a reduction in early PB rates, emphasizing the clinical value of integrated diagnostic approach. Conclusion: The combined use of elastography and cervicometry, particularly through the E-Cervix index, provides accurate risk assessment for preterm delivery in women with ICI. This approach demonstrates strong diagnostic performance and supports timely clinical decision-making, enhancing early intervention and improving outcomes in high-risk pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.