ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning-enhanced Colmap for 3D reconstruction and segmentation of facial port-wine stains for comprehensive evaluation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Port-wine stains: molecular drivers, translational models, and emerging theragnostic directions.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and segmentation of port-wine stains (PWS) is crucial for effective treatment planning and objective outcome evaluation. Yet, these tasks are challenged by the lesions' diverse shapes, color heterogeneity, and indistinct boundaries. This study aims to develop an integrated approach for 3D reconstruction and segmentation of PWS lesions to address these challenges. Methods: We propose a novel method that combines deep learning with the Colmap 3D reconstruction algorithm. First, we established a standardized image acquisition system with color calibration to capture high-quality, color-accurate two-dimensional (2D) images, thereby ensuring a robust basis for generating precise 3D PWS point clouds. Second, the 2D images collected from 17 patients were reconstructed into 3D point clouds and converted into closed, easily computable mesh models. Third, the multi-color space adaptive fusion network was employed for 2D lesion segmentation. The 3D lesion morphology was reconstructed by utilizing prior information from their 3D point clouds, and the 3D lesion surface area was subsequently calculated. Results: The proposed 3D reconstruction method achieved an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.9611 mm when registered against a structured-light scanning reference. Additionally, the contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP) similarity score between the 3D mesh model and the corresponding 2D image exceeded 0.92, collectively validating the reconstruction accuracy. The average relative error between the computed 3D lesion surface area and the ground-truth area was 4.59%, outperforming conventional 2D measurement approaches and supporting more reliable quantitative assessment. Conclusions: High-quality 3D PWS lesions with accurate boundaries and superior color fidelity were successfully obtained. Our method integrates deep learning with Colmap to facilitate precise 3D reconstruction and segmentation of PWS lesions, offering a promising tool for PWS assessment and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.