Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367787›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Differences in left ventricular functional properties in healthy adults with greater end-diastolic versus end-systolic aortic valve annular area-detailed analysis from the three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiographic MAGYAR-Healthy Study.

Attila Nemes, Nóra Ambrus, Csaba Lengyel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Attila NemesDepartment of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Nóra AmbrusDepartment of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Csaba LengyelDepartment of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: According to the literature, in one-third of the cases, the aortic valve annulus (AVA) is greater in end-diastole than in end-systole under certain conditions. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to assess potential differences in left ventricular (LV) functional properties observed in healthy individuals, based on whether the end-diastolic or end-systolic AVA area was larger. Methods: The present cohort study consisted of 254 Caucasian healthy adults, from which 142 subjects were excluded due to inferior image quality (56%). Thus, the final population comprised 112 individuals [mean age: 33.7±11.1 years, 69 males, body mass index (BMI): 18.5±0.19 kg/m Results: No differences in routine 2D echocardiographic data and 3DSTE-derived LV volumetric parameters could be detected between the groups examined. Global and mean segmental LV strain showed no differences between the groups. However, basal LV radial (29.1%±9.2% Conclusions: Although most of healthy adults have a greater end-systolic than end-diastolic AVA area, 30% of cases show a greater end-diastolic AVA area. Healthy subjects with a greater end-diastolic AVA area demonstrated reduced basal radial and longitudinal LV strains, as well as lower basal LV rotation, compared with those with a greater end-systolic AVA area.

Indexed as

aortic valve annulus (AVA)Healthyleft ventricular strainspeckle-tracking echocardiography (STE)three-dimensional (3D)

Identifiers

PMID41367787
PMCPMC12682547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.