ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Assessment of a brief point-of-care ultrasound training workshop among a large cohort of medical students.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has generated increasing interest among clinicians and educators and prompted several medical societies to publish guidelines for its integration into medical schools' curricula. Université Paris Cité (UPC) proposed that 180 final-year students participate in a pilot practical POCUS workshop before residency. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and evaluation of this workshop. Students were welcomed in groups of 30 during 10-hour sessions during which each group of 3 to 4 students shared one scanner and performed examinations on each other under supervision. They completed a questionnaire to assess their prior ultrasound experience and evaluate their self-confidence in visualizing the designated targets before and after the workshop on a scale from 0 to 10. At the end of the workshop, students had to perform a timed ultrasound examination targeting 15 anatomical areas. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges. Before the workshop, 144 students (82.3%) reported having no or little experience with ultrasound. Post-workshop, self-confidence improved significantly from 4 [3-6] to 8 [7-9], P<0.0001, and exhibited reduced variability among the different targets. In the final timed test, 123 out of 164 students (75%) who performed the test achieved all 15 ultrasound targets within 5 minutes {252 [210-285] seconds}. Short, focused workshops can efficiently equip students with fundamental ultrasound skills, significantly enhance their self-confidence, and could be a first step into integrating POCUS into large cohorts of medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.