ArticleERJ open research2025
Long-term effects of medical treatment in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Impact of Preoperative Hemodynamic Values on Development of Reperfusion Edema After Pulmonary Endarterectomy.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The New International Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) Registry, conducted between 2015 and 2019, revealed the significant impact of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) on the long-term survival of CTEPH patients. The objective of the current pre-specified analysis was to evaluate the effect of medical treatment, including the approved oral guanylate cyclase stimulator (sGC) riociguat, in patients with or without mechanical intervention. Methods: 1009 newly diagnosed patients were included in the study, with recruitment conducted at 34 centres across 20 countries. At the outset of the registry, sGC was available in 85% of the countries involved. Results: 52% of all patients included were treated with pulmonary hypertension (PH) drugs. The proportion of patients receiving PH drugs was 38% among the 605 patients who underwent PEA, 78% among the 185 patients who underwent BPA and 76% among the 219 remaining patients who did not undergo PEA or BPA. In the "BPA" and "no PEA/BPA" groups, the 3-year survival was superior in patients who received sGC in comparison with other PH drugs. Cox regression confirmed that sGC treatment was associated with reduced mortality in the global cohort, in the BPA group and in the "no PEA/BPA" group. Conclusion: This international CTEPH registry suggests that, although an increasing proportion of patients with CTEPH benefited from mechanical treatment, medical treatment with sGC may be associated with a survival advantage in patients undergoing BPA or no intervention. These observations confirm the results of previous randomised controlled trials in a real-world setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.