Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367639›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Multimodal imaging of apophyseal avulsion fractures in adolescent soccer players: contributions of plain radiography, power Doppler, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Roberto Mogami, Claudio Henrique Ivo de Araújo Ribeiro Filho, Eduardo Brown Guedes Dos Santos, André de Almeida Vieira, Lucas Nascimento da Luz, Caio Leal Leidersnaider, Natália Fernandes de Azevedo, Edson Marchiori, Paulo Sérgio Chagas Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberto MogamiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas (PGCM) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7610-2404
Claudio Henrique Ivo de Araújo Ribeiro FilhoVasco da Gama Sociedade Anônima do Futebol, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-9436-487X
Eduardo Brown Guedes Dos SantosHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (HUPE-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-9946-785X
André de Almeida VieiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Radiologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-5384-7266
Lucas Nascimento da LuzPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas (PGCM) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-4588-7198
Caio Leal LeidersnaiderSuprema - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Três Rios (FCM/TR), Três Rios, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7472-0428
Natália Fernandes de AzevedoHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (HUPE-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-8938-8165
Edson MarchioriPrograma de Pós-graduação em Radiologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-7380
Paulo Sérgio Chagas GomesInstituto de Educação Física e Desportos (IEFD/UERJ), Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1026-8639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate, primarily, the accuracy of plain radiography (X-ray) in diagnosing apophyseal avulsion fractures in adolescent soccer players, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard. As secondary objectives, we investigated associations between findings on X-ray, MRI, and power Doppler, as well as the imaging features that distinguish avulsion fractures from apophysitis. Materials and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study involving 33 male athletes 9-17 years of age with clinical suspicion of an apophyseal avulsion fracture. Imaging examinations were performed within the first 24 h after the trauma. We evaluated diagnostic reproducibility among readers, the accuracy of X-ray compared with MRI, and the associations between findings from different imaging methods. Results: We found that X-ray had an accuracy of 56.0%, with high specificity (71.4%) and positive predictive value (81.8%), although its sensitivity and negative predictive value were relatively low (50.0% and 35.7%, respectively). The power Doppler result was significantly associated with avulsion fractures detected on MRI ( Conclusion: X-ray is useful for confirming, but not for excluding, avulsion fractures. Power Doppler and MRI contribute to the differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

avulsionDopplerFracturesMagnetic resonance imagingRadiographySoccer/injuries.Ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41367639
PMCPMC12685293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.