ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Multimodal imaging of apophyseal avulsion fractures in adolescent soccer players: contributions of plain radiography, power Doppler, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Apophyseal injuries in adolescent athletes: the multimodal radiological perspective.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate, primarily, the accuracy of plain radiography (X-ray) in diagnosing apophyseal avulsion fractures in adolescent soccer players, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard. As secondary objectives, we investigated associations between findings on X-ray, MRI, and power Doppler, as well as the imaging features that distinguish avulsion fractures from apophysitis. Materials and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study involving 33 male athletes 9-17 years of age with clinical suspicion of an apophyseal avulsion fracture. Imaging examinations were performed within the first 24 h after the trauma. We evaluated diagnostic reproducibility among readers, the accuracy of X-ray compared with MRI, and the associations between findings from different imaging methods. Results: We found that X-ray had an accuracy of 56.0%, with high specificity (71.4%) and positive predictive value (81.8%), although its sensitivity and negative predictive value were relatively low (50.0% and 35.7%, respectively). The power Doppler result was significantly associated with avulsion fractures detected on MRI ( Conclusion: X-ray is useful for confirming, but not for excluding, avulsion fractures. Power Doppler and MRI contribute to the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.