ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Application of trio-based whole-exome sequencing in fetal ultrasound anomalies: a single-center retrospective study of 454 cases.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the diagnostic effectiveness of trio-WES compared to CMA in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and explored optimal prenatal testing strategies. A retrospective review included 454 fetuses who underwent trio-WES and/or CMA between 2020 and 2023. Cases were divided into four groups and 19 subgroups based on improvements in diagnosing ultrasound anomalies, demonstrating that trio-WES offers greater diagnostic value than CMA-especially for skeletal and multisystem defects, as well as ultrasound findings used to determine diagnostic yields. Trio-WES achieved a diagnostic yield of 22.7% (103/454), exceeding CMA by 17%. The highest diagnostic rates were observed in skeletal anomalies (39.2%) and multisystem anomalies (29.1%). Subgroup analysis showed higher yields in crystalline lens anomalies (60.0%) and cardiac rhabdomyoma (57.1%). Trio-WES significantly enhances prenatal diagnosis of ultrasound anomalies and provides additional diagnostic insights over CMA, particularly for skeletal, multisystem defects, and specific structural subgroups. Importantly, trio-WES helps clarify the mechanisms of ROH and assess its pathogenicity, aiding in detecting imprinted disorders. These findings support including trio-WES in prenatal testing protocols for congenital malformations and establish a framework for its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.