ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Sensory-level electrical stimulation in children with cerebral palsy: a scoping review of current applications and outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07491341 (The Effect of Subthreshold Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity and Functionality in Patients With Spastic Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Subthreshold Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity and Functionality in Patients With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory-level electrical stimulation in children with cerebral palsy: a scoping review of current applications and outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on sensory-level electrical stimulation (ES) interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and PEDro were searched. Among 504 screened articles, 18 studies were included. ES forms utilized included transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic electrical stimulation (TheES), threshold electrical stimulation (ThrES), Mesh-Glove Stimulation, and the Mollii suit. The reviewed ES modalities were used in upper extremities, lower extremities, and whole-body treatments. Results: Some significant improvements were noted in motor control, spasticity, strength, and functional abilities. Discussion: While the findings suggest that sensory-level ES holds promise for enhancing motor function in children with CP with significant improvements shown in the relevant outcome measures in fourteen of eighteen papers, the existing literature is characterized by significant variability in stimulation parameters, study design, sample sizes, patient characteristics and outcome measures hindering the ability to generalize findings. Further research with larger, more homogeneous samples and standardized protocols are essential to validate these interventions and establish effective treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.