ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
"Treatment is both psychological and medical": applying mixed methods to the understanding of mental and behavioral health in pediatric specialty medicine.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Mental and behavioral health (MBH) access varies in pediatric specialty medicine and rural healthcare. This study aimed to characterize healthcare professionals' perceptions and experience with MBH services and readiness for change. Methods: Thirty rural healthcare professionals completed validated questionnaires and semistructured interviews designed to meet study objectives. A convergent mixed methods design with a comparison method of interpretation was followed. Results: Thematic analysis yielded three major themes highlighting the prevalence of MBH concerns in practice, global perceptions of MBH care, and related barriers/facilitators to implementation. Current levels of MBH integration varied though overall readiness for change was high. Discussion: Findings highlight stakeholder perceptions about the role of MBH in pediatric specialty medicine. Key considerations for those who utilize or plan to adopt integrated MBH care at various levels are discussed, including readiness to change and other structural (e.g., organizational) or individual factors serving as facilitators and barriers to implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.