ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Toward a nurse-oriented management framework for premature ovarian insufficiency: Integration of guidelines and consensus recommendations.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements on premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) to formulate a nurse-oriented management framework, thus promoting nurses' adherence and advancing evidence-based nursing practice. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify CPGs and consensus statements on POI published in English or Chinese between 2019 and 2024. The methodological quality of included CPGs was independently assessed by two authors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Similarly, the quality of consensus statements was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist for Text and Opinion papers. Recommendations from high-quality publications were extracted and synthesized into a preliminary management framework. This framework was specifically tailored to align with the perspective and clinical context of nursing practice. The preliminary framework was subsequently refined through an expert consultation process to ensure its validity and practicality. Results: Four CPGs and two consensus statements, all rated as "high quality", were included in the framework. Concordance between the authors ranged from substantial to near-perfect agreement (0.79-1.0). In developing the framework, recommendations from the CPGs were identified and consolidated into three categories: management of high-risk POI populations, management of POI patients, and management of patients with POI-related complications. Conclusions: The included CPGs and consensus statements concerning POI were all recommended for use in clinical practice. Using existing evidence, we developed a nurse-oriented management framework to bolster nurses' adherence to the guidelines and foster evidence-based nursing practices. Further research is needed to provide evidence-based health care in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.