ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Development of a large language model-based knowledge graph for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer and its implications for nursing.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuro-symbolic LLM Integration in Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse effect among breast cancer patients, significantly affecting quality of life. Existing evidence on the prevention, assessment, and management of this condition is fragmented and inconsistent. This study constructed a CINV knowledge graph using a large language model (LLM) to integrate nursing and medical evidence, thereby supporting systematic clinical decision-making. Methods: A top-down approach was adopted. 1) Knowledge base preparation: Nine databases and eight guideline repositories were searched up to October 2024 to include guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and systematic reviews screened by two researchers. 2) Schema design: Referring to the Unified Medical Language System, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms, and the Nursing Intervention Classification, entity and relation types were defined to build the ontology schema. 3) LLM-based extraction and integration: Using the Qwen model under the CRISPE framework, named entity recognition, relation extraction, disambiguation, and fusion were conducted to generate triples and visualize them in Neo4j. Four expert rounds ensured semantic and logical consistency. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, and 95 % confidence interval (95 % Result: A total of 47 studies were included (18 guidelines, two expert consensuses, two evidence summaries, and 25 systematic reviews). The Qwen model extracted 273 entities and 289 relations; after expert validation, 238 entities and 242 relations were retained, forming 244 triples. The ontology comprised nine entity types and eight relation types. The F1-scores for named entity recognition and relation extraction were 82.97 (95 % Conclusion: The LLM-based CINV knowledge graph achieved structured integration of nursing and medical evidence, offering a novel, data-driven tool to support clinical nursing decision-making and advance intelligent healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.