ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Unveiling the clinical impact of plasma-only mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a Korean multicenter experience.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plasma-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a promising tool to complement tissue genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly when tissue acquisition is limited. We investigated the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in Korean patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients with NSCLC who underwent plasma ctDNA testing between June 2017 and December 2021 in the K-MASTER project. Mutation detection rates, concordance between tissue and plasma results, and survival outcomes according to targeted therapy administration were evaluated. Clinical characteristics of plasma-only mutations were further examined. Results: Actionable mutations were identified in 43.2% of patients through combined tissue and plasma analyses. Plasma ctDNA testing revealed actionable mutations in 11.4% of patients not detected by tissue genotyping, seven of whom received targeted therapy based on plasma results. Rare co-occurring actionable alterations were found in three patients, including concurrent EGFR and KRAS or ALK and EGFR mutations, suggesting intratumoral heterogeneity or possible multiple primary cancers. Among the three cases with plasma-positive but tissue-negative results, one had biopsies from bone and one from liver, suggesting possible effects of sampling bias or clonal evolution. Patients who received targeted therapy-guided by either tissue or plasma results-demonstrated significantly improved survival compared with those who did not (P=0.03). Conclusions: Plasma-based ctDNA analysis broadens detection of actionable genomic alterations and facilitates access to targeted therapies in NSCLC, particularly when tissue biopsy is limited. These findings support integrating liquid biopsy into routine practice to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.